Standing Up for Home Schooling

Parents have every right to educate their children- concentrate on their work;
at home, based upon knowledge gathered- are persistent and complete their projects;
throughout their lives. They should and can do so,- are inquisitive;
with a fair dose of responsibility. I admire who is- show great will to learn;
capable of achieving such a deed, because the- are motivated and with tremendous thirst for
amount of stress involved in the task is onlyknowledge;
comprehended by those who actually do it.- express a strong interest for the arts;
However, the results are unmatched by the ones- manifest an expanded view of the world;
obtained by the public school system. We have- have happy, positive attitudes;
the example of the Villena Family, in Brazil. This- are friendly and charming;
case serves to show how a country's educational- have charisma for others, knowing how to deal
system takes a long time to be updated inwith others, demonstrating good manners;
comparison to the advances achieved in the world- appreciate the success of other children;
as to child education and about the citizens´- aren't critics with other kids and have tolerance
right to seek the very best way to educate theirwith each kid's rhythm, with their individual
children.differences;
In 2004, I was asked to give some theoretical- don't become inhibited by outside opinions;
support to the Villena Family, defending the choice- aren't exhibitionists and pompous;
that they made to teach their 6 kids at home. In- are spiritually and mentally well adjusted;
the occasion they had just entered with a judicial- lead and are well succeeded, without much
order, (in Portuguese, "Mandato de Seguranca"effort;
(MS 7407/DF) seeking the Superior Justice- adapt easily to different situations;
Tribunal of Brazil to evaluate the demands that- possess advanced logic and think analytically;
the educational system had required from them.- have a phenomenal ability to solve problems and
In fact, what the government was asking fordemonstrate different strategies of thought;
went against the family's goals, since they wanted- believe that human relations are important;
to keep home schooling their kids. The educational- are independent and wish to try out everything;
system intended to obligate them to enroll their- are responsible for their own learning;
children in the Brazilian formal educational system.- like to teach what they know;
At the time, the Minister Dr. Franciulli Netto, asked- ...Among many other positive characteristics!
for evidence in the legal procedure, and I sentAside from these theoretical arguments listed
(under their family name and at their request) aabove, I witnessed my experience with my three
theoretical justification on the importance ofchildren, 24 years before then, in which they
educating children at home. My intent was to aid inwere objects to home schooling and that the
the Minister's decision, thus helping the resolutionBrazilian government had recognized our efforts,
of the case.giving them the right to be accelerated in school,
I began my defense of home schooling bytaking into consideration what they had learned at
claiming that it is what's scientifically proven by allhome. I explained that we also had gone through
the modern education institutes of the world toa judicial legal procedure and that the Federal
be the most up-to-date. I criticized the fact thatCouncil of Education of the period had recognized
the family had seen denied their right to educatemy family's right to give education within the
their kids at home, in the family's environment. Ihome. The case could not have been
requested that the analysis of the legal procedurecharacterized as the same, since my kids went to
at hand should start from the evidence that hadschool and were, at the same time, helped at
been listed in the legal proceedings, that containedhome, with specialized attention. However, I added
documents proving the initiative's success andthat the objective had been reached by both
that these legal proofs could, in little time, openfamilies, mine and the Villena´s. And that, in
doors to new legal courses of action to improveconsequence, we were both examples of success
even the quality of schooling in Brazil. Thisin the initiative of giving the best possible
evidence could help the country's educationaleducation for our children. I gathered that my kids
history to advance into consolidating the family'shad entered early in the university and are, today,
right to seek out what's best for their kids, actinghappy professionals well integrated in society. And,
as an initiation cell of teaching in society. I claimedgiven the many that went through the same
that his decision could promote education in theprocess, the children of this family could also, and
country and clarify as to a series of prejudicewith absolute certainty, achieve much success and
that clouds the thoughts of many jurists andbe happily satisfied in life.
educators, such as "the family doesn't educate",I argued that my testimony, along with
"the children do not belong to the family", and thatinformation itself could avoid, with the support of
"the education of the Brazilian is an obligation ofhis positive decision, that yet another Brazilian
the constituted State".family be discredited and discouraged in their
I argued that the Brazilian State at the timeefforts and sincerity in trying to permit a better
wasn't responding for its obligations regardingeducation for their children, an education which the
education, letting it be seen that we had a crisis inBrazilian State still isn't capable of providing. I also
higher learning and had data showing that wesaid that I expected a family not to be hindered
have millions of illiterates populating Brazilianby the official institutions´ lack of information
territory. And that, if a family was giving a greatso that we wouldn't see this same family seeking
example of dedication to their kids, the Brazilianalternative means for their children's education
State should exalt them and take it as referenceelsewhere, outside our homeland, thus causing the
and not, take from them the right to exerciseevasion of intelligent minds to other scientific
acts of citizenship.centers. I finalized arguing that the Villena Family,
I argued that the success of the educationallike so many others like them in Brazil, and that
modality called home schooling throughout thehadn't expressed themselves yet, mine included,
world, led us to assert that the children observed,and that believed firmly in their kids´ talent,
in various countries, and that were submitted tobelieve that we are a wonderful people. They
this kind of specialized education, presentedbelieve that the right to have their voices heard
behavior and/or results that I would clarify forthroughout all national territory should be a
him with great pleasure. Based upon Dr. Neilguarantee, a must! Voices that will echo favoring
Harvey, in his book Kids Who Start Ahead, Staynew insights for the evolution of the human
Ahead (Avery Publishing Group, New York, 1994),being's intelligence as a whole. Voices that know
I showed and argued, based also upon myhow to exercise the hope of better days for our
personal experience and that of other Braziliannation and for the world.
mothers, that most children that haveMy intervention didn't help much. The Villena
experienced and/or experience Home SchoolingFamily, 14 years after my family had been
end up being or are:authorized to educate the kids in the home
- interesting and imaginative;schooling system, could do nothing but watch their
- Comunicate well;kids be impeded, in the same (memory-less)
- love language profoundly;country, of continuing to study at home; and,
- present advanced vocabulary and a vastwere, by the legal means of force (the law had
knowledge regarding what they say;now been differently interpreted), forced to enroll
- never demonstrate to be out of ideas;their children in formal schooling; to accomplish,
- can talk to anyone about anything;most certainly, many less interesting deeds than
- are incredibly creative, inventive and surprise usthose they were accustomed to in the family
with interesting observations;environment.
- build their own toys;So here's my criticism to those countries that still
- rationalize beyond their age level;don't value the power of home schooling. And my
- are disciplined;protest and legitimate support to the families that
- are cooperative;have obtained success with the initiative
- are positive when establishing goals tothroughout the world. What a beautiful example
accomplish;we've been giving society as a whole!