Welcome to your ultimate homeschooling resource


Standing Up for Home Schooling

Parents have every right to educate their
children at home, based upon knowledge- are motivated and with tremendous thirst
gathered throughout their lives. They shouldfor  knowledge;
and can do so, with a fair dose of
responsibility. I admire who is capable of-  express  a  strong  interest for the arts;
achieving such a deed, because the amount of
stress involved in the task is only-  manifest  an  expanded  view of the world;
comprehended by those who actually do it.
However, the results are unmatched by the-  have  happy,  positive  attitudes;
ones obtained by the public school system. We
have the example of the Villena Family, in-  are  friendly  and  charming;
Brazil. This case serves to show how a
country's educational system takes a long- have charisma for others, knowing how to
time to be updated in comparison to thedeal with others, demonstrating good manners;
advances achieved in the world as to child
education and about the citizens´ right to-  appreciate  the success of other children;
seek the very best way to educate their
children.- aren't critics with other kids and have
tolerance with each kid's rhythm, with their
In 2004, I was asked to give some theoreticalindividual  differences;
support to the Villena Family, defending the
choice that they made to teach their 6 kids- don't become inhibited by outside opinions;
at home. In the occasion they had just
entered with a judicial order, (in-  aren't  exhibitionists  and  pompous;
Portuguese, "Mandato de Seguranca" (MS 7407
DF) seeking the Superior Justice Tribunal of- are spiritually and mentally well adjusted;
Brazil to evaluate the demands that the
educational system had required from them. In- lead and are well succeeded, without much
fact, what the government was asking for wenteffort;
against the family's goals, since they wanted
to keep home schooling their kids. The-  adapt  easily  to  different  situations;
educational system intended to obligate them
to enroll their children in the Brazilian- possess advanced logic and think
formal educational system. At the time, theanalytically;
Minister Dr. Franciulli Netto, asked for
evidence in the legal procedure, and I sent- have a phenomenal ability to solve problems
(under their family name and at theirand demonstrate different strategies of
request) a theoretical justification on thethought;
importance of educating children at home. My
intent was to aid in the Minister's decision,- believe that human relations are important;
thus  helping  the  resolution  of  the case.
- are independent and wish to try out
I began my defense of home schooling byeverything;
claiming that it is what's scientifically
proven by all the modern education institutes-  are  responsible  for  their own learning;
of the world to be the most up-to-date. I
criticized the fact that the family had seen-  like  to  teach  what  they  know;
denied their right to educate their kids at
home, in the family's environment. I- ...Among many other positive
requested that the analysis of the legalcharacteristics!
procedure at hand should start from the
evidence that had been listed in the legalAside from these theoretical arguments listed
proceedings, that contained documents provingabove, I witnessed my experience with my
the initiative's success and that these legalthree children, 24 years before then, in
proofs could, in little time, open doors towhich they were objects to home schooling and
new legal courses of action to improve eventhat the Brazilian government had recognized
the quality of schooling in Brazil. Thisour efforts, giving them the right to be
evidence could help the country's educationalaccelerated in school, taking into
history to advance into consolidating theconsideration what they had learned at home.
family's right to seek out what's best forI explained that we also had gone through a
their kids, acting as an initiation cell ofjudicial legal procedure and that the Federal
teaching in society. I claimed that hisCouncil of Education of the period had
decision could promote education in therecognized my family's right to give
country and clarify as to a series ofeducation within the home. The case could not
prejudice that clouds the thoughts of manyhave been characterized as the same, since my
jurists and educators, such as "the familykids went to school and were, at the same
doesn't educate", "the children do not belongtime, helped at home, with specialized
to the family", and that "the education ofattention. However, I added that the
the Brazilian is an obligation of theobjective had been reached by both families,
constituted  State".mine and the Villena´s. And that, in
consequence, we were both examples of success
I argued that the Brazilian State at the timein the initiative of giving the best possible
wasn't responding for its obligationseducation for our children. I gathered that
regarding education, letting it be seen thatmy kids had entered early in the university
we had a crisis in higher learning and hadand are, today, happy professionals well
data showing that we have millions ofintegrated in society. And, given the many
illiterates populating Brazilian territory.that went through the same process, the
And that, if a family was giving a greatchildren of this family could also, and with
example of dedication to their kids, theabsolute certainty, achieve much success and
Brazilian State should exalt them and take itbe  happily  satisfied  in  life.
as reference and not, take from them the
right  to  exercise  acts  of  citizenship.I argued that my testimony, along with
information itself could avoid, with the
I argued that the success of the educationalsupport of his positive decision, that yet
modality called home schooling throughout theanother Brazilian family be discredited and
world, led us to assert that the childrendiscouraged in their efforts and sincerity in
observed, in various countries, and that weretrying to permit a better education for
submitted to this kind of specializedtheir children, an education which the
education, presented behavior and/or resultsBrazilian State still isn't capable of
that I would clarify for him with greatproviding. I also said that I expected a
pleasure. Based upon Dr. Neil Harvey, in hisfamily not to be hindered by the official
book Kids Who Start Ahead, Stay Ahead (Averyinstitutions´ lack of information so that
Publishing Group, New York, 1994), I showedwe wouldn't see this same family seeking
and argued, based also upon my personalalternative means for their children's
experience and that of other Brazilianeducation elsewhere, outside our homeland,
mothers, that most children that havethus causing the evasion of intelligent minds
experienced and/or experience Home Schoolingto other scientific centers. I finalized
end  up  being  or  are:arguing that the Villena Family, like so many
others like them in Brazil, and that hadn't
-  interesting  and  imaginative;expressed themselves yet, mine included, and
that believed firmly in their kids´
-  Comunicate  well;talent, believe that we are a wonderful
people. They believe that the right to have
-  love  language  profoundly;their voices heard throughout all national
territory should be a guarantee, a must!
- present advanced vocabulary and a vastVoices that will echo favoring new insights
knowledge  regarding  what  they  say;for the evolution of the human being's
intelligence as a whole. Voices that know how
-  never  demonstrate  to  be  out  of ideas;to exercise the hope of better days for our
nation  and  for  the  world.
-  can  talk  to  anyone  about  anything;
My intervention didn't help much. The Villena
- are incredibly creative, inventive andFamily, 14 years after my family had been
surprise  us  with  interesting observations;authorized to educate the kids in the home
schooling system, could do nothing but watch
-  build  their  own  toys;their kids be impeded, in the same
(memory-less) country, of continuing to study
-  rationalize  beyond  their  age  level;at home; and, were, by the legal means of
force (the law had now been differently
-  are  disciplined;interpreted), forced to enroll their children
in formal schooling; to accomplish, most
-  are  cooperative;certainly, many less interesting deeds than
those they were accustomed to in the family
- are positive when establishing goals toenvironment.
accomplish;
So here's my criticism to those countries
-  concentrate  on  their  work;that still don't value the power of home
schooling. And my protest and legitimate
- are persistent and complete their projects;support to the families that have obtained
success with the initiative throughout the
-  are  inquisitive;world. What a beautiful example we've been
giving society as a whole!
-  show  great  will  to  learn;



1 A B C D E F 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137