Welcome to your ultimate homeschooling resource


classicapple.com keyword stats



Most current MSN search phrases:

"oregon home schooling"  

Yes, Madam President

I know that this is the time for an Americanmeans, "everyone is in this for money". This
Woman to become President of the Unitedwould mean your present in-office
States of America.Irregardless of the "rightpolitician!What woman has all this? None!Then
or wrong" of that. No matter your concernwhy worry about a woman jumping on the
about a woman leading the Nation. And mostbandwagon out of the sidelines, or wings of a
especially, ignoring those for whom havestage? Because this country is ready for one.
knowledge that having such a female leader isNot only ready, but wanting one! I can
a curse, not a blessing!And, if you can, putexplain this "readiness" in this way.The
aside any animosity for this authors' viewsRepublicons are failing in the polls. They
just expressed. Either side of the issue. Ihave to try to pay to make a poll come out,
have no "side" of this "issue" as a matter ofas opposed to paying to make a poll (come
fact. That is because I know, I say; I know,out). You know, or should, that any poll you
that this country is coming to a dramaticand I hear about, will be written,
end! Does that shock you? It shouldn't.Nowstructured, and paid for by those interested
that we have the "preparers" about of thein the outcome. But only interested in the
way, we can venture into the real issue ofoutcome. Not interested in any manner of a
"women Presidents", and leave the alreadypoll that shows the opposite of what is
present "women leadership" aside for thewanted! So if "they" fund it, then they "own"
moment.If we were to have a woman elected forit. And if it happened to say, "negative" or
President, and I think we will have at least"positive", when the opposite is wanted, then
a woman Vice-President, who would she be?as "owners" they chunk it. It is
Give that some thought if you have not"copyrighted". Contracts signed up front can
already done so in the near past.If we haveand do take care of those instances. Those
someone, other than Mrs. Clinton, and Ms.instances will not happen by "Pollsters",
Rice (I don't know if she is married?). Webecause they are in this for the money! And
can leave those two national known women forwho can make money from people telling the
later. Right at the moment, we are speakingtruth, whenever those that want polls done
to the point of who the President would be ifwant "their truth". They don't lie, but may
it were a woman. Which would leave out of theas well. The question is like the one that a
grouping, the two ladies mentioned.Is there alawyer uses in court if he can get away with
"known" entity ready at the stage wings whoit. If you answers "Yes', you are in trouble,
can "pounce' upon the coming opportunity? Ifand if you answer 'No", you are in the same
there is, she needs to be well funded. Soboat. "Please just answer "yes" or "no", like
what would be the normal assets needed by anyhis honor told you too! Did you like having
man (and now presumably woman,) would needsex with me last night?" See? That is too
whenever considering running? Can they beeasy to perform. Polling is like magic. And
listed by citizens at large? Not an expertlike Magic, it can be more than slight of
listing, but a thumbsketch of thehand.Well, we have reached the end of our
qualifications that would lead a person tothinking about the subject. And this is what
the Presidency.One mentioned is funding. He,I can see. I get them "vibrations" from time
or she, would have to have tons of money.to time ya know? If a "serious" Female
Millions. And be able to come into thePresidential Candidate ( serious means here
contest with the ability to generate millionshaving all the above mentioned assets) she
more. Millions means that the candidate wouldwould come from California. If any Female
be connected and known by a large percentagePresidential Candidate makes her way to a
of those controlling or having money."win" in the coming election, I think she
Billionaires are important here. Would youwill have to decide to try for a contest, or
turn down some Billionaire just because hegive over to running on a proffered VP seat.
starts wars after "investing in a CountriesVice-President Office is offered to any
currency, to watch it move one way or thepowerful, or prominent "runner-up" in the
other, as he deems fit? Well, too late! Youparade leading up to the real election day.
might not take his millions, but your/ourIn the end of the parade the "second place"
representatives already do! Unabashedly!Andis not always chosen. But the person with the
funding would mean money from other nations"runner-up", meaning in money first, and
leaders. If you would turn down money frompower within the Politburo of this nation, is
Israel, or Syria, or Saudi Arabia, then youweighed. If she maintains those assets, then
can never be a Presidential Candidate, letshe will be given, or proffered, the VP
alone any other national office. But othersposition. This would be for gaining the women
in office nationally, and at the state levelvote. However if she has a Miss-step, as some
do! Unabashedly.The Russians cannot "chipcandidates have in the past while in front of
in', and the countries of Great Britain;the people, she will get the
Spain; France; do not have to! They already"door-prize".Anyone getting the "proffer"
control though, not only money, but in otherwould be from Texas. I can think only of one
ways. The Vatican, I suspect is in the "givepossible person, woman, that would fit that
a few millions" category! Unabashedly. But inbill. She would be a "heavy hitter" in the
secret.Knowledge is the second factor. You"powerful" connections, as well the
might overcome experience, if you have aexperience category. But how about her money
great "second", like Bush has Chaney. And youquotient? I have no way to know how large it
might not worry about volunteers. Becausehas gotten in scope, but she obviously had
that groundswell can be generated or forcedenough "graftuity" to make it to
by those you may hire. Only the sane (knownCongress!Now, what about an African-American?
or unknown) and or persons that are unknownOr an Mexican-American. Nope! For complex
nationally fail to generate a following. Allreasons, there is not going to be a
of your representatives in office now had tosuccessful bid by an African-American for
hire experts at all levels and generatePresidential office. But there will be one in
volunteers, led by paid "volunteers", to getthe next generation! The Good Lord willing,
into office. Unabashedly.The third I hold inthis nation will have another generation to
importance is the ladies background. If youhave such a won. The Mexican-Americans are in
think a dirty background is hard on any mantrouble, not only locally, statewide, but
that might be elected, then you can hardlyNationally as well. The antics that was
imagine what a woman might have to gofostered on the "Activists" by those that
through. Any background would have to be moreknew how it was going to be later on,
than just clean. A man, like Bush, couldfinished the chances of any Mexican-American
drink to much at times, or Clinton, can whorePolitical Candidacy for the near future. For
at times, and that is just being "one of theour discussion, I mean Mexican-American, not
boys". In fact, whether or not you believemixed blood. We have tons of mixed blood
it, women will not vote for a man that is toopolitical persons in office.All that needs to
clean! It would be easier for a serial killerbe done now, is to forecast a single woman
to get elected than a "Billy Grayham" type!from California to be President! Single here
And that is a shame. Not because I would likedoes not mean "not married". Nor would any
to see a "minister" type leader, but that I"married=married" qualify. Not yet, than that
think "clean" is not a bad thing for Americansame Lord. Not from Northern California. Not
Presidents. But what Politician could toefrom L.A. That is about as far as I can
that line? None! And that is a shame. Becausesee.Later,
I also know that most Preachers couldn't even
pretend to toe that line!Dan BunchDan Bunch, a Cherokee; Choctaw; and
Unabashedly."Respect" from other politicians.Melungeon; whose mother was a naturalized
I put that "respect" into quotation markscitizen born in Hong Kong. His father was
because I do not mean respect. I meanborn in Texas, a Cherokee-Choctaw-Melungeon,
"respect" the way that politicians know andwho served in the Army during WWII.Dan Bunch
understand and respect. If a person is known,grew up in Texas, where he participated in;
then they have assets as well as detractorsfootball, baseball, and boxing. He enlisted
in the line-up of in-office politicians. Thein the United States Navy Reserve while still
way I would list the persons by occupation,a junior in high school. He has had a
that could affect a persons chance to gainmultitude of experience in the business world
office, is; Leadership in the Party. Too bad,in; insurance, real estate, finance, and a
that. And next Leadership in office withinbuilder of custom homes. He has always been a
the whole of Congress. But above all,writer, and cartoonist. He attributes his
leadership in parties that are not elected!interest in many subjects to his early career
Those who swing a big "bat", that canas a newspaper boy. He married his high
generate funds from the Party membership areschool sweetheart Gayle, with whom they have
right up there at first on the list if nottwo children and five grandchildren.Dan Bunch
tied with the first mentioned. Without theis a graduate of Grayson Co Jr. College,
"grease" applied to places that "meet thewhich he attended upon his return from
road" then nothing can be done for aVietnam. He was a PO2'nd, crewmember aboard
candidate. And "nothing" in this contextU.S.



1 A B C D E F 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137