| I know that this is the time for an American | | | | means, "everyone is in this for money". This |
| Woman to become President of the United | | | | would mean your present in-office |
| States of America.Irregardless of the "right | | | | politician!What woman has all this? None!Then |
| or wrong" of that. No matter your concern | | | | why worry about a woman jumping on the |
| about a woman leading the Nation. And most | | | | bandwagon out of the sidelines, or wings of a |
| especially, ignoring those for whom have | | | | stage? Because this country is ready for one. |
| knowledge that having such a female leader is | | | | Not only ready, but wanting one! I can |
| a curse, not a blessing!And, if you can, put | | | | explain this "readiness" in this way.The |
| aside any animosity for this authors' views | | | | Republicons are failing in the polls. They |
| just expressed. Either side of the issue. I | | | | have to try to pay to make a poll come out, |
| have no "side" of this "issue" as a matter of | | | | as opposed to paying to make a poll (come |
| fact. That is because I know, I say; I know, | | | | out). You know, or should, that any poll you |
| that this country is coming to a dramatic | | | | and I hear about, will be written, |
| end! Does that shock you? It shouldn't.Now | | | | structured, and paid for by those interested |
| that we have the "preparers" about of the | | | | in the outcome. But only interested in the |
| way, we can venture into the real issue of | | | | outcome. Not interested in any manner of a |
| "women Presidents", and leave the already | | | | poll that shows the opposite of what is |
| present "women leadership" aside for the | | | | wanted! So if "they" fund it, then they "own" |
| moment.If we were to have a woman elected for | | | | it. And if it happened to say, "negative" or |
| President, and I think we will have at least | | | | "positive", when the opposite is wanted, then |
| a woman Vice-President, who would she be? | | | | as "owners" they chunk it. It is |
| Give that some thought if you have not | | | | "copyrighted". Contracts signed up front can |
| already done so in the near past.If we have | | | | and do take care of those instances. Those |
| someone, other than Mrs. Clinton, and Ms. | | | | instances will not happen by "Pollsters", |
| Rice (I don't know if she is married?). We | | | | because they are in this for the money! And |
| can leave those two national known women for | | | | who can make money from people telling the |
| later. Right at the moment, we are speaking | | | | truth, whenever those that want polls done |
| to the point of who the President would be if | | | | want "their truth". They don't lie, but may |
| it were a woman. Which would leave out of the | | | | as well. The question is like the one that a |
| grouping, the two ladies mentioned.Is there a | | | | lawyer uses in court if he can get away with |
| "known" entity ready at the stage wings who | | | | it. If you answers "Yes', you are in trouble, |
| can "pounce' upon the coming opportunity? If | | | | and if you answer 'No", you are in the same |
| there is, she needs to be well funded. So | | | | boat. "Please just answer "yes" or "no", like |
| what would be the normal assets needed by any | | | | his honor told you too! Did you like having |
| man (and now presumably woman,) would need | | | | sex with me last night?" See? That is too |
| whenever considering running? Can they be | | | | easy to perform. Polling is like magic. And |
| listed by citizens at large? Not an expert | | | | like Magic, it can be more than slight of |
| listing, but a thumbsketch of the | | | | hand.Well, we have reached the end of our |
| qualifications that would lead a person to | | | | thinking about the subject. And this is what |
| the Presidency.One mentioned is funding. He, | | | | I can see. I get them "vibrations" from time |
| or she, would have to have tons of money. | | | | to time ya know? If a "serious" Female |
| Millions. And be able to come into the | | | | Presidential Candidate ( serious means here |
| contest with the ability to generate millions | | | | having all the above mentioned assets) she |
| more. Millions means that the candidate would | | | | would come from California. If any Female |
| be connected and known by a large percentage | | | | Presidential Candidate makes her way to a |
| of those controlling or having money. | | | | "win" in the coming election, I think she |
| Billionaires are important here. Would you | | | | will have to decide to try for a contest, or |
| turn down some Billionaire just because he | | | | give over to running on a proffered VP seat. |
| starts wars after "investing in a Countries | | | | Vice-President Office is offered to any |
| currency, to watch it move one way or the | | | | powerful, or prominent "runner-up" in the |
| other, as he deems fit? Well, too late! You | | | | parade leading up to the real election day. |
| might not take his millions, but your/our | | | | In the end of the parade the "second place" |
| representatives already do! Unabashedly!And | | | | is not always chosen. But the person with the |
| funding would mean money from other nations | | | | "runner-up", meaning in money first, and |
| leaders. If you would turn down money from | | | | power within the Politburo of this nation, is |
| Israel, or Syria, or Saudi Arabia, then you | | | | weighed. If she maintains those assets, then |
| can never be a Presidential Candidate, let | | | | she will be given, or proffered, the VP |
| alone any other national office. But others | | | | position. This would be for gaining the women |
| in office nationally, and at the state level | | | | vote. However if she has a Miss-step, as some |
| do! Unabashedly.The Russians cannot "chip | | | | candidates have in the past while in front of |
| in', and the countries of Great Britain; | | | | the people, she will get the |
| Spain; France; do not have to! They already | | | | "door-prize".Anyone getting the "proffer" |
| control though, not only money, but in other | | | | would be from Texas. I can think only of one |
| ways. The Vatican, I suspect is in the "give | | | | possible person, woman, that would fit that |
| a few millions" category! Unabashedly. But in | | | | bill. She would be a "heavy hitter" in the |
| secret.Knowledge is the second factor. You | | | | "powerful" connections, as well the |
| might overcome experience, if you have a | | | | experience category. But how about her money |
| great "second", like Bush has Chaney. And you | | | | quotient? I have no way to know how large it |
| might not worry about volunteers. Because | | | | has gotten in scope, but she obviously had |
| that groundswell can be generated or forced | | | | enough "graftuity" to make it to |
| by those you may hire. Only the sane (known | | | | Congress!Now, what about an African-American? |
| or unknown) and or persons that are unknown | | | | Or an Mexican-American. Nope! For complex |
| nationally fail to generate a following. All | | | | reasons, there is not going to be a |
| of your representatives in office now had to | | | | successful bid by an African-American for |
| hire experts at all levels and generate | | | | Presidential office. But there will be one in |
| volunteers, led by paid "volunteers", to get | | | | the next generation! The Good Lord willing, |
| into office. Unabashedly.The third I hold in | | | | this nation will have another generation to |
| importance is the ladies background. If you | | | | have such a won. The Mexican-Americans are in |
| think a dirty background is hard on any man | | | | trouble, not only locally, statewide, but |
| that might be elected, then you can hardly | | | | Nationally as well. The antics that was |
| imagine what a woman might have to go | | | | fostered on the "Activists" by those that |
| through. Any background would have to be more | | | | knew how it was going to be later on, |
| than just clean. A man, like Bush, could | | | | finished the chances of any Mexican-American |
| drink to much at times, or Clinton, can whore | | | | Political Candidacy for the near future. For |
| at times, and that is just being "one of the | | | | our discussion, I mean Mexican-American, not |
| boys". In fact, whether or not you believe | | | | mixed blood. We have tons of mixed blood |
| it, women will not vote for a man that is too | | | | political persons in office.All that needs to |
| clean! It would be easier for a serial killer | | | | be done now, is to forecast a single woman |
| to get elected than a "Billy Grayham" type! | | | | from California to be President! Single here |
| And that is a shame. Not because I would like | | | | does not mean "not married". Nor would any |
| to see a "minister" type leader, but that I | | | | "married=married" qualify. Not yet, than that |
| think "clean" is not a bad thing for American | | | | same Lord. Not from Northern California. Not |
| Presidents. But what Politician could toe | | | | from L.A. That is about as far as I can |
| that line? None! And that is a shame. Because | | | | see.Later, |
| I also know that most Preachers couldn't even | | | | |
| pretend to toe that line! | | | | Dan BunchDan Bunch, a Cherokee; Choctaw; and |
| Unabashedly."Respect" from other politicians. | | | | Melungeon; whose mother was a naturalized |
| I put that "respect" into quotation marks | | | | citizen born in Hong Kong. His father was |
| because I do not mean respect. I mean | | | | born in Texas, a Cherokee-Choctaw-Melungeon, |
| "respect" the way that politicians know and | | | | who served in the Army during WWII.Dan Bunch |
| understand and respect. If a person is known, | | | | grew up in Texas, where he participated in; |
| then they have assets as well as detractors | | | | football, baseball, and boxing. He enlisted |
| in the line-up of in-office politicians. The | | | | in the United States Navy Reserve while still |
| way I would list the persons by occupation, | | | | a junior in high school. He has had a |
| that could affect a persons chance to gain | | | | multitude of experience in the business world |
| office, is; Leadership in the Party. Too bad, | | | | in; insurance, real estate, finance, and a |
| that. And next Leadership in office within | | | | builder of custom homes. He has always been a |
| the whole of Congress. But above all, | | | | writer, and cartoonist. He attributes his |
| leadership in parties that are not elected! | | | | interest in many subjects to his early career |
| Those who swing a big "bat", that can | | | | as a newspaper boy. He married his high |
| generate funds from the Party membership are | | | | school sweetheart Gayle, with whom they have |
| right up there at first on the list if not | | | | two children and five grandchildren.Dan Bunch |
| tied with the first mentioned. Without the | | | | is a graduate of Grayson Co Jr. College, |
| "grease" applied to places that "meet the | | | | which he attended upon his return from |
| road" then nothing can be done for a | | | | Vietnam. He was a PO2'nd, crewmember aboard |
| candidate. And "nothing" in this context | | | | U.S. |