The Right to Opinion

There is often much talk of the right to beinsult this man. Nor would I harass him in any way
treated equally, despite one's religion or one'sthat would cause discomfort or antagonism. I
ethnicity or one's gender. Over the past century,would only offer my opinion, as he offered to me.
our society has shifted this debate from suchI would not rise in an uproar to upset his creed. I
older-discussed traits as skin color and gender towould raise the lantern of Reason, and soundly
things such as sexual orientation. Though thereoffer logic in opposition to his creed. There can be
are still Civil Rights battles going on today fornothing so irrational as resorting to unkindly
equal treatment of individuals regardless ofsentiments to those who hold different opinions,
ethnicity or gender, Civil Rights today alsoor to denying opportunity to those who with
encompasses other traits of individuals whichdifferent ethics. It is not my right to say that a
before were discriminated against without soman cannot believe one thing or another.
much as a thought.The reason why it is irrationalEveryone is their own individual, capable of
to discriminate against someone on their race isbelieving as they wish for themselves. Anyone
because one's race does not (normally) interferewho states differently, that claims we have no
with their line of work. Now, there are definitelyobligation of kindness or sincerity to those who
circumstances where such preference isbelieve otherwise, is an obstacle in the race for
absolutely justified. If a company was advertisingknowledge, a blockade to the doorway of
and their statistics department had told them thatopportunity, a stone on the path for life.When I
few African humans buy their products, theysay that discrimination should not occur to man
may decide to advertise with more Africanbecause of his beliefs, I do not mean to govern
models. Would it be rational, in any reasonablethe lives of those who may sometimes judge on
man's mind, that the company should be forcedbeliefs, and I certainly do not mean to fill their
to hire as many Caucasion models as Africanlives with guilt. There is a number of great
models? I would doubt that with great sincerity.individuals who refuse to have a relationship with
If, however, an insurance company was lookingsomeone outside of their race. And this will not be
for a secretary, then the race of the secretaryout of scorn, or of hate, or of some other
would be completely irrelevant. Being a goodunbecoming trait. It is because of uncomfortability,
secretary is not about one's appearance, butor even an inability to relate to someone. A man
wholly about one's intellectual capabilities, perhapscannot be blamed for being uncomfortable around
typing skills and diligance. It is not a question ofother races any more than a man can be blamed
looks, but a question of intellect. To say that thefor the race he is. If an individual with this
modeling company was discriminating by choosinguncomfortable sentiment concerning members of
an African human over a Caucasion human isother races were to see a member of another
equally true as saying the insurance company wasrace afflicted with some ailment, and if this
discriminating by choosing a smart secretary over"race-phobic" person were to offer aid -- not out
an unintelligent secretary.The battles for Civilof any sort of fear or reward, but out of the
Rights of the people, regardless of race, gender,sake of pure compassion -- can we honestly call
or sexual orientation, will continue on for perhapsthis person full of hate or anger? To make such a
an inestimable number of years. The advocatesclaim would be to advance ignorance and to put a
of Civil Rights will exist as long as there is Reasonscar on the face of humaneness. Though
and active compassion, and the opponents of Civilindividuals who feel out of place when among
Rights will exist as long as there is someother races may stereotypically have one image
ignorance and selective cruelty. A Whiteof being pristine, this stereotype -- like every
Supremacist may say that he will deny himselfother -- does not hold true for all of these
friendship or comradery with every non-White,individuals. In this group of individuals, there are
based on that non-Whites are incapable of makinggood, warm-hearted, kind people, and to make an
good friends. As every good person of non-Whiteopposition against them is to become an enemy
ethnicity passes by this Supremacist, as everyof every Humanitarian who contends that duty
human being possesing the traits of kindness andand justice are our first priorities.Just as it is an
reverance, beauty and vitality, intelligence andatrosity to try to make someone act the same
understanding, as every good person with anyto other races when they themselves are
skin color passes by this supremacist, the man willuncomfortable with other races, it is also cruel and
find himself a little more alone, a little lessinhumane to insult someone for not being
knowledgeable, and gravely disadvantaged. So thecomfortable with others of different beliefs. A
battle of equal rights will continue, as long as thereperson may find it displeasurable to be among
is a group being persecuted, and as long as thereother races. So a person may find it displeasurable
are heroes of our species to defend them. Everyto be among believers of Nazism, Fascism,
man or woman denied an opportunity because ofDemocracy, the electoral process, Socialism,
traits which he cannot control is a badge ofCommunism, Pacifism, or any other creed which
dishonor upon the ever-weakening chest ofhas been wrought from humanity. If a man
humanity, a boulder upon the back of truth, and ahonestly tells me, "I will not be among those
slash across the face of beauty. As long as therepeople, because the things they say and the way
is discrimination in the heart of any man, there willthey act bothers me," then I can hold no
always be fallacies in his mind and intolerance in hisanimosity whatsoever to him, but if a man tells
actions.There is one battlefield that has almostme, "I will not be among those people, because
been entirely unsuccesful in the case for Civilthey are innately cruel, beyond recompense,
Rights. This is the battlefield for the Right topassed the point of worth," then I will only be
Opinion. Think not that I am speaking of the rightdeep within disappointment. There are few creeds
to belong to any political party, or believe in anythat a man can believe that will put him beyond
religion. These rights, however, are still under siegethe point of opportunity. Though a man has a
by those without a rational framework of thoughtright to association, to be with those he likes and
-- this right to political theory is still a source ofavoids those he dislikes, I can only hope that the
hate for those who do not weild Reason orstar of fairness will shine, and all of our hearts will
humaneness, and it will probably always exist, asbe open to others. But beyond this matter of
long as there is a ruling class. The Right to Opinionassociation, it is important that a man can receive
that I speak of is the right to believe all that youa job, a place to live, a place to buy food and
wish, without being discriminated against. Thoughother necessities, without harassment for his
the right to belong to any political party or anycreeds. Let a man believe as he wish, and you
religion may be counted as part of this, the Rightcan only hope that Reason will govern his
to Opinion still does not prevail. What man canjudgment. Harassment will accomplish nothing, but
openly, publicly, and brazenly say that he findswill work away at the man's tolerance for others.
Nazism to be a sound ideology, and then easilyI cannot govern society or its members, but as
find employment? Would a black shop owner hirefar as the economy goes, no man should be
this man, even if the Nazi was willing? If a manbehind bars because of their beliefs. This is a
were to announce his membership intestament to freedom as much as it is a
North-American Man-Boy Love Assocationconfession of humaneness and a declaration for
(NAMBLA, working for the rights of adults forbeauty in tolerance.Though observation will allow
consensual sexual relationships with minors), wouldus to easily see that our society is not always
announcing one's membership of such anaccepting of another man's Right to Opinion, a
organization boost their chances of employmentperson cannot go far in their intellectual journey
or relationships? It is unpopular today to evenwithout hearing someone say, "That person has
assert that Nazism is right, or that Pedophilia maytheir to their own opinion!" Though this is certainly
be right. But if someone were to cling to suchtrue, it is unlikely for someone to say this about a
ideologies, based on the juries of their mind, theyman who believes Pedophilia is justifiable. It would
will be harmed in all ways: employment will bebe of most difficulty to hear a man say "You
difficult, friendships and family may be curtailed,have your right to your opinion" when another
and other social or economic conditions mayattempts to justify Pedophilia. It would be gravely
worsen, simply by holding an opinion.If andifficult to hear the same when a person makes
employer refused to hire someone on thea heretical remark, mocking a god or the unseen
grounds that they held a certain opinion, howspirits of the worlds' religions. I only feel the need
could they respond? There are probably ato comment on this, that though everyone has
thousand laws inhibiting employers from suchtheir right to their opinion, we always have the
actions, or completely disallowing public institutionsright to comment on their opinion, or hold an
from denying citizens their right to equalopinion of an opinion. The point of existence for
treatment. But there are amazingly few lawsintellectual debate is not to find some conclusion,
upholding a man's right to belief in whatever heor to meet some compromise about some
wishes. If a man professed belief in Nazism, thephilosophical triffle. It is, utmostly, so that we can
business across this nation may very well refuseunderstand each other and -- with the serene
to employ him or to serve him. And, if he werehope that only sleeping children can dream of --
to seek aid in his right to belief, I doubt therethat we will clear the way a little. That will we
would be a single politician who would stand besideremove any fog that pollutes our thinking,
him. The ruling class are not concerned withdestroy stereotypes, burn all aspirations that are
justice so much as they are concerned withmade from imitation, and bury every vice.
looking good in the eyes of the public. BeingIntellectual debate is the foundation for anything
associated with a Nazi is not something that wouldthat was individually great and
help reelection of any public official. But do notaccomplishing.Before closing, there are some facts
only think of Nazism as a creed a man may holdwhich ought to be put into light for those who still
that would harm him. If a man were to shout outdisagree with me. Before anyone lights a torch in
in public, "It is okay to have sex with children!" heeffort to burn out their enemy for some
would be outcast. Employment would beideology, first think of Giordano Bruno. Remember
impossible, people would sneer, and the whole ofthe monk who travelled throughout Europe,
society would be his enemy, as much as they aredodging the hounds of the Vatican as much as he
enemies to the Right to Opinion.Do humans havecould, only so that he could write out what he
the Right to Opinion beyond political parties andbelieved, only so he could try to prove that
religious belief? It is undeniable. So much as a mancompassion would conquer the world. Remember
cannot choose his skin color, in many ways a manthe physician Servetes, burned at the stake by a
cannot choose his belief. If we see a crime beingtyrant. Remember his exodus from the church,
committed, we cannot help but believe that itbreathless for life as he searched the land for
took place. If we are presented with the evidencesome refuge, and denied any sentiment of
of a crime, we cannot help but believe that therecompassion, as John Calvin mercilessly ordered
is a high probability that it took place. But thesedeath. Think of Thomas Paine. He wrote a book,
are the thoughts of a rational man. If, beingand they unleashed the hounds of iniquity with the
presented with the evidence, a man comes toorders of destruction and cruelty. He spoke his
believe that Caucasions are superior to Africans,mind, and they gave him the death sentence. He
or Africans are superior to Jews, or Jews arewas put behind the bars of a French prison as
superior to Hispanics, -- if a human being, with hismuch as he was put behind the bars of intellectual
own mind and his own will, gathers evidence forprison. Think of Francisco Ferrer. He taught the
himself and discovers reasons to believe as hechildren of Spain a secular education, gave them
does -- if a man does this, then what do wethe gift of literacy and thought, instilled in them an
accomplish by punishing him for speaking? Everyinsatiasable appetite for knowledge and truth. His
man certainly must have the right to judge factsonly gift to humanity was teaching and kindness,
for himself, regardless of what any court in theand his only sacrifice was his own life. Remember
world says. It is not about supressing Nazism,all who have given their lives only because they
Fascism, Sexism, Racism, Capitalism, Speciesism,believed as they did, only because they felt that
and every other ill-doctrine by any means possible.they were compelled towards truth, and
It is not about silencing those who oppose meremember the animosity we gave their offenders
ideologically. It is about holding up the individual as-- remember the unbridled scorn and contempt
the supreme leader of society; it is aboutheld for those who executed heretics and
understanding the right of every person to believeheathens. Before anyone raises their fist in
as they wish, allowing the pathway to the templeindignance towards someone with another creed,
of any theory, opening the door to a kingdom ofremember our heroes, how they were killed for
ideas and concepts, releasing the chains aroundtheir beliefs, and why we will always cherish their
the legs of every slave and holding the torch upmemories in our hearts. Life,Punkerslut (or Andy
at night so they know where to go to get toCarloff) has been writing essays and poetry on
freedom. The Right to Opinion is the same as thesocial issues which have caught his attention for
right to belief, and upholding it is the same as theseveral years. His website provides a complete list
responsibility to decency, and the duty toof all of these writings. His life experience includes
civilization.If a man comes to me and tells me thathomelessness, squating in New Orleans and LA,
all other races are inferior, that Free Enterprisedropping out of high school, getting expelled from
benefits the worker, that animals have no rightcollege for "subversive activities," and a myriad of
other than to be eaten, or that real religionother revolutionary actions.
consists of a god in a far-away Universe, I will not