Man's Place in the Universe

Until Galileo and the Renaissance, man was firmlyNone other than man himself, this otherwise
at the center of his universe, as defined anddespised and practically eliminated entity!
illustrated by scientists and philosophers alike. ThisOf course, mere observation is not enough. A
belief was perhaps best shown in the geocentriccamera or a photographic plate also might be said
model of the solar system, started by theto make a record of an event. What is needed in
Egyptian astronomer, Ptolemy, nearly twoaddition is the human consciousness, and this is
thousand years ago, to which many othersfully recognized in quantum mechanics. A popular
contributed before it became the officiallybook on the weirdness of quantum mechanics
accepted version, blessed by the Church, inputs it like this:
Galileo's time. This model placed a fixed Earth at"Quantum theory insists that our reasonable,
the center not just of the solar system but ofeveryday worldview [that objects are
the entire known universe, including the "sphere"independently real] is fundamentally wrong.
of the fixed stars, with everything else in theDifferent interpretations of what the theory tells
heavens rotating around it, just as it appears tous offer different worldviews. But every one of
anyone looking at the night sky.them involves the mysterious encounter of
This model meant that man, together with theconsciousness with the physical world......The
Earth itself, occupied the most important positionencounter with consciousness arises directly in the
in the whole of the divine creation. Then camequantum-theory-neutral experimental
Galileo, who championed the Copernican model ofdemonstration. No mere interpretation of the
the solar system, in which the center wastheory can avoid the encounter."
occupied by the sun, not the earth. Man was notIn the quantum mechanical universe, there is a
yet very far from the center, on the thirddisquieting speculation that man is not only
"sphere" from the central sun, but neverthelessimportant in the scheme of things but that he is
his importance in the scheme of things wasapparently involved in the very appearance of the
greatly diminished.phenomena of the natural world. This is not only
The sciences of the new age, which started inan abrupt reversal of his diminishing importance
the seventeenth century, then conspired tosince medieval times, it actually raises his
reduce man to ever greater insignificance. Theimportance far above that of merely placing him
only subjects of the new physics that Galileoin the center of the universe. When he occupied
recognized as fit for scientific inquiry were matterthat central position, man was still very firmly a
and motion, precisely for the reason that (in hiscreated being only and not involved in any way
opinion) man was not needed for their existencewith the creation itself. In fact, above man and
in nature. They were independent of man. Then itreaching far into the heavens, were the "spheres"
became obvious that man was not nearly as oldof the planets and the stars, each one under the
as the world. Far from being created only a fewguidance (and motive power) of one of the
"days" after the rest of the world, he actuallyangelic hierarchies, from the lowest (or ordinary)
came into the picture at a very late stage of theangels, who guided the moon, to the mightiest of
earth's development. The rest of nature had anall, the seraphim, in charge of the "primum mobile",
independent history of its own, several billions ofthe region beyond the fixed stars. All these
years older than the earliest appearance of man.majestic hierarchies that stretched beyond lowly
Even more denigrating was the picture of manmankind and up to the divinity, were all still
that emerged from this scientific study of hiscreated beings. Now quantum mechanics is not
origins. Far from being created "in the image ofsimply reversing man's insignificance, but raising
God" he was, it turned out, nothing more than ahim up to levels never before dreamed of. What
slightly advanced ape. All science concentrated onis to be made of all these cross-currents? Where
finding similarities between him and this ancestraldoes mankind really fit into the overall picture of
ape, rather than fundamental differences.creation?
Later still came many theories questioning thePerhaps a review of our ideas of man's origin
uniqueness of our solar system, our galaxy ormight be useful. At present, the conventional view
indeed the universe we can perceive.is that matter is the primary substance from
Mathematically, there were many other universeswhich everything else, such as life or
as possibilties. A recent article on string theoryconsciousness, evolved. Both modern physics in
had this to say about man's position in our world:general and quantum mechanics have come to
"The infinite number of solutions to string theorythe conclusion that matter, as perceived through
points to the most mind-blowing possibility of all:the senses, is not independently real. It is no more
that the universe itself is not unique, but is justthan a subjective appearance so that the creation
one example of a possibly infinite number ofof life and man did not occur as a natural process
"universes". It would be the ultimate downgradingon this earth, based on the increasing complexity
of mankind. Far from being center-staged, as theof the protein molecule. If, as Heisenberg says,
first astronomers believed, humanity has already"the atoms or elementary particles themselves
been shuffled gradually out of the limelight byare not real; they form a world of potentialities or
each new consmological insight. An infinite numberpossibilities rather than of things or facts", then
of universes would reduce it to utter cosmicthe origin of matter must be looked for
insignificance."elsewhere. And if this is true for the origin of
So here we have an apparently inexorable seriesmatter, it must also be true for the origin of life
of diminishments of man, from a giant ofand man, because these do not exist on earth
significance at the center of the entire creation, towithout matter.
someone who could barely be found with anThis whole argument from quantum mechanics
electron microscope in a corner of a minor sunpresents a serious challenge to presently accepted
system, located in a rather dull and unspectacularthinking about the early ages of this earth, before
galaxy among billions of others, in one of anthe appearance of man. According to this latest
infinite number of possible universes. Mankind, asthinking, there is an inherently close connection
an interesting species, seemed about played out.between man and nature. As one exponent put it:
The implications of quantum theory dropped into"Useful as it is under everyday circumstances to
this dispiriting scene, completely reversing itssay that the world exists "out there" independent
trend. It seemed that reports of the death of theof us, that view can no longer be upheld. There is
significance of humanity had been greatlya strange sense in which this is a 'participatory
exaggerated. Quantum theory is not new: ituniverse'."
started at the very beginning of the twentiethThe extreme weirdness of quantum mechanics
century, so its development was parallel to thatand the newly unsatisfactory status of man can
of other branches of physics. It seems, however,be resolved only by a comprehensive review of
that nobody cross-checked the data about thereality in physics today, as the above quotation
importance of man in different parts of physics.indicates. For most of us today, if we think
The very puzzling and indeed absurd soundingcasually, the independent existence of nature "out
consequences of quantum mechanics can bethere" is still objectively real; it does not depend
found fully detailed in the literature on thaton the presence of human beings and their
subject, so only the bare results will be mentionedsenses. Although this is what we feel in everyday
here. One of these consequences states thatlife, physics no longer supports this view.
observation not only marks the objective"Participation", on the other hand, implies
observed, but actually brings it into existence.subjectivity, that is the presence of man and his
Before the observation, there was no physicalsenses. If objective reality can no longer be
objective. (Quantum experiments are usuallyapplied to events and phenomena of the physical
conducted on subatomic particles, but theworld, it might well be a property of a world of
implications are general, both in theory and in vieworigins, by definition beyond the reach of our
of the fact that large physical objects consistsenses, but nevertheless real. Such an expansion
entirely of these small particles). As a leadingof the framework within which physics operates
quantum cosmologist put it: "No microscopicmight well be the essential step towards solving
property is a property until it is an observedthe various difficulties and inconsistencies
property". And who does this vital observing?mentioned in this article.