Implicit Phonics Or Explicit Phonics?

"There is more than one way to skin a cat" isCouncil, and the National Reading Panel, have all
saying that means there are multiple ways toconducted research and released finding reports
accomplish something. I have heard this used athat support this statement. The National Reading
few times and although it is a little bit disgusting, itPanel's report on their quantitative research
makes me laugh. In most cases it is absolutelystudies on areas of reading instruction was
true; there is usually more than one solution to apublished in 2000. The panel reported that several
problem and different ways to approach mostreading skills are critical to becoming good readers:
tasks. When talking about teaching reading, therephonics for word identification, fluency, vocabulary
are several approaches that have beenand text comprehension. With regard to phonics
researched and debated. The aforementionedtheir meta-analysis of hundreds of studies
idiom also means that an issue can be approachedconfirmed the findings of the National Research
in different ways but the final result will be theCouncil: teaching phonics (and related phonics skills,
same. With reading, that is not the case. Thesuch as phonemic awareness) is a more effective
manner of instruction is just as important, if notway to teach children early reading skills than is
more so, as what is instructed and it significantlyembedded phonics or no phonics instruction (taken
affects the results.from National Institute of Child Health and Human
What is explicit phonics?Development. (2000). Report of the National
Explicit phonics, also referred to as syntheticReading Panel. Teaching children to read: An
phonics, builds from part to whole. It begins withevidence-based assessment of the scientific
the instruction of the letters (graphemes) withresearch literature on reading and its implications
their associated sound (phoneme). Next, explicitfor reading instruction (NIH Publication No.
phonics teaches blending and building, beginning00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government
with blending the sounds into syllables and thenPrinting Office)
into words. Explicit phonics is scientifically provenScientific research has clearly demonstrated that
and research based.explicit phonics instruction is the single most
What is implicit phonics?effective approach for all students. Obviously,
Implicit phonics, also referred to as analyticalmany students can learn to read without such
phonics, moves from the whole to the smallestinstruction; however, it is not only the at-risk
part. Phonemes associated with particularstudents who achieve greater success under a
graphemes are not pronounced in isolation.phonics regime - so do those in the average and
Students analyze words and look for thebelow reading groups (those who do OK, but not
common phoneme in a set of words. Throughreally well). A large scale study by Barbara Fman
comparison and identification they deduce whatand colleagues from the University of Houston
grapheme to write or phoneme to read. Blendingfound that explicit, systematic phonics was by far
and building is not usually taught and studentsthe most effective approach. It was also more
identify new words by its shape, beginning andeffective in reducing the occurrence of reading
ending letters and context clues. This analysisproblems than any of the one-on-one tutorial
(breaking down) of the whole word to its parts isprograms that were evaluated, including Reading
only necessary when a child cannot read it as aRecovery. Her findings are consistent - both with
whole word. This is a whole language approach.currently accepted theories of reading
Which approach is best?development and instruction, and with other
Research has been conclusive that explicit phonicsempirical research emphasizing student outcome
instruction is the most effective. The U.S.measures.
Department of Education, the National Research